Planet X: Days to FULL MOON Slowing FACT

Please note the TREND charts
(http://www.zetatalk.com/usenet/use00861.htm and use00862.htm) which
most dramatically shows the result of the following analysis done by Mr.
Precision himself (who became interested in this subject when he noted
his clocks and watches a tad fast by x seconds year to year, lately, and
who the heck notices that - only Mr. Precision, himself.).  I murmurred
something about doing an analysis of a the 80’s, as well as the 90’s, to
see if the trend line changed, and off he went ...  Bottom line, the
slowing of the Earth means the Full Moon comes x seconds EARLIER,
increasingly, since 1985, but for some curious reason took LONGER from
1950 to 1985.  Stay tuned, as the Zetas explain.  In this post, the
analysis from Mr. Precision himself.

From Mr. Precision, the Full Moon Analysis:

The published date and time (nearest Minute) for Full moons from 1950 to
present time (2001) is tabulated at:
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html.  Because of the amount
of variation in data points from year to year, a large number of points
was needed to get a good average and see the
current trends.

The trend for the last 52 years (1950-2001) is shown as a 10.3 sec/year
(chart)
The trend for the last 42 years (1960-2001) is shown as a 13.6 sec/year
(chart)
The trend for the last 32 years (1970-2001) is shown as a 13.8 sec/year
(chart)
The trend for the last 22 years (1980-2001) is shown as a -7.4 sec/year
(chart)
The trend for the last 12 years (1990-2001) is shown as a -22.3 sec/year
(chart)

If one now takes the left half of each trend line and strings them
together for the appropriate number of years (that they would apply to)
then one gets (chart at http://www.zetatalk.com/usenet/use00862.htm).
This curve changed to seconds (of change) from year to year then gives
(http://www.zetatalk.com/usenet/use00861.htm). We observed the moon to
start to speed up after 1985 (makes for shorter moon months), what does
this mean?  Assume for now the reported date-time is accurate Atomic
time and this is clicking at a constant rate.  Assume for now no hidden
leap seconds.

For a full moon the moon is measured in relation to the sun and the
earth's rotation around the sun. The earth and moon has to lie along the
same radial line from the sun to get a full moon.  The daily rotation of
the earth would then be factored out of the equation.  In fact full
moons could occur any time of the day. So the bottom line would be
either the moon is going around the earth faster or the earth is going
around the sun slower.

Now if one assumes the atomic clocks are being adjusted slower (added
undocumented leap sec) to match a slowing daily rotation of earth then
what do we get?   One would expect fewer turns of the planet between
full moons.  This would record as shorter times between full moons, and
look like a speed up of the moons rotation around the earth.  This is
exactly what we are seeing in the data since about 1985.  10 years later
in 1995 the moons orbital rotation is about 150 sec faster for every
29.5 days. This would be an equivalent of about 30 min/year.

Note: Someone is going to ask why not plot past 1995 up to 2001. The
answer is not enough data points to make a good trend.  12 years is
about a minimum with such widely varying data.  Even that is pushing
it.   There are naturally long time cycles in this data.  The main point
with all this is there is something going on. More exact data is needed
and it is worth looking at now to determine exactly what is happening.
This is the challenge I give to the scientific community.

Mr. Precision