Re: Planet X Debate Enterprise2002 vs J.William Dell

To: Brian Gillbanks Enterprise2002

  Sir;

Debate;

   As we have been unable to agree on the issue of the images before
commencing debate, and as any other method of achieving consensus is
time consuming, I propose to include the question of the images in the
debate proper.
   
   On that basis, I will deliver my opening remarks on this debate by
Friday Oct 25, 2002 @ 23:59:00 UT ( 8 pm EST ).

   Your opening remarks to follow at your pleasure,

Answers to Questions;

1) Why here on sci-astro?

The Astronomic community outside of gov't control is the first to
witness the return of PX and will be the first possible warning system
to the public.

2)  > >> To you and those following the Zeta scenario the prime directive is
    > >> to "get out the word" (just over 7 months left) and this is not the
    > >> type of venue that would achieve that aim. Which then begs the
    > >> question"why is it so important that sci-astro acknowledges Nancy's
    > >> claims". As all indications have and still are that they do not 
    > >> believe after all these years so the effort has achieved absolutely
    > >> zero.

The Answer is the same as # 1.
The difference at this time is 3 sets of images provided to Sci.Astro
and the world.

3) > >> What are your intentions regarding the release of this new
   > >> discovery? After all death and destruction aside this would 
   > >> constitute a new anomaly. At the very least it should make both you 
   > >> and Havas very famous. Yet within your scenario there should also be
   > >> certain urgency in releasing this new find, as it will most 
   > >> certainly signify our inevitable end. Can we expect to see you 
   > >> both on CNN or  the BBC with Nancy? In other words, what if  
   > >> anything,(in real terms)are you doing to make your discovery   
   > >> known other than playing games here? After all is it not a world  
   > >> wide arena you seek? And if not why not?
   >  

You have misunderstood the motives of a number of people.
And the method of publicity employed. 
The most effective advertising is the moccasin telegraph, 
getting the word out to communities and individuals in advance 
will allow time for reduced panic 
and more coherent planning of action.
The incoming planet will reach a point 
where mainstream media will begin reporting, 
hopefully to a populace with its heads up and ready,  
due to its early warning by friends who have read these Sci.Astro
communications.

Enterprise2002 quote;
"After all death and destruction aside this would constitute a new
 anomaly. At the very least it should make both you and Havas very famous."

It is obvious from your above remarks,
you and I come from very different value structures. 


> Professors John Matese, Patrick Whitman and Daniel Whitmire of the
> University of Louisiana are presently working on a similar theory
> connected to the twelfth planet, in that they were trying to endorse
> the theory of a sister sun named Nemesis, but have recently revised
> the theory towards something resembling the 12th planet.

In regards to Professor Matese, et al, I am familiar with their work
and applaud their effort.


I will submit my opening statement to this thread (Re: Planet X Debate
Enterprise2002 vs J.William Dell) before the date and time specified
above.

   Regards
   J.William Dell