Re: Planet X: Changing the PAST?

In Article <3C7EA2FF.9D02FC71@zetatalk.com> Nancy Lieder wrote
> Steve Havas has identified CHANGES in process on DSS images and NEAT
> images provided to the public as existing Star Charts!  This CHANGE, in
> process, began promptly after my announcement on sci.astro that new
> infrared images had been take on January 19, 2002 at the coordinates
> given by the Zetas.  Steve made note that David Tholen, who works in
> Hawaii where the NEAT program is headquartered, was out of pocket and
> had no comment for days after this announcement.  Humm.
>
> We suggest those who have copies of existing Star Charts KEEP THEM as
> the past is changing before your very eyes!  What the PATH of the
> changing past, as it following, like a panting dog, after the Zeta
> Coordinates!  Whatever else happens, the rich and powerful get to know,
> but you do NOT.  Die in the earthquakes, get washed out to sea with your
> babes in your arms, stumble around broken and dazed and bleeding and
> starving, wondering why your government did not alert you, but YOU don't
> count!  You're just the taxpayer.  They're busy getting ready to leap to
> Mars, in 2003, or at least eat all those Meals Ready to Eat they are
> stashing away, and protecting the rich and powerful with the beefed up
> military the Bush Administration is busy lining up to protect the
> carry-on government.  They're sure you'll want this, after all, how can
> you possibly get along WITHOUT them?
>
> From Steve:
>
> NASA Skyview Images
> Nancy, when I went back to look at these images which I was looking at
> last nite from Skyview, they now clearly show an object where the Jan
> 17/2002 object is! I looked at this exact same image very carefully last
> night at least a dozen times and there was NOTHING there at that spot! I
> am not able to send that image yet because the viewer I'm using cannot
> do that. I have to run out the door but I'll see if I can bring it up on
> the other viewer I have (the one that can invert etc.)
>
I have a correction to make in the above - The Jan 17,2002 image I refer to
is supposed to be the Jan 19,2002 image that was taken at the Haute-Provence
observatory. Also, the new spot I noticed on the DSSII is LOWER than the new
spot on the Jan 19, 2002 image. It took me by surprise because I really did
not recall seeing it the day before and as I had to rush out I did not take
the time to line it up properly... However, when I was just comparing it to
the NEAT images (which appear to be of better quality than the DSSII images
as the fainter objects show up more clearly) that spot on the DSSII (from
SkyView) does NOT appear in the least from what I could see on any of the
six NEAT images I looked at (Jan 17, 2001 & Jan 26, 2001). It looks like the
mystery spot on the DSSII lines up closely with the second new spot which
appears on the Jan 19 image. Maybe the guys are getting their spots mixed
up!

> NEAT image
> On this image you can see when comparing the two spots in question that
> the one below is without a doubt larger and brighter than the one above.
> Also, when I was trying to bring up the NEAT images from Dec. 16/2001
> that IMO had on his site (which show the spot in question to be even
> larger and brighter than the Jan 17/2001 image), all three pictures come
> up with only a small part viewable in the shape of a cross and
> says there are serious astrometry errors with the image. When I go to
> see the actual .fits file most of the data is missing or all the same
> repeating sequences in large chunks. Definitely someone has been in
> there I think for it to look like that and it has to have been recent
> otherwise IMO would not have been able to post the image on sci.astro...
>
> Caught! (I think)
> Another contrast view of yesterdays (Feb 26,2002) DSSII image. NO spot
> except the one which appears above and the same spot as the Jan 5,2002
> image!
>
> Nancy, just by chance I happened to save an image from the DSSII
> yesterday and it does not show anything at the Jan 19/2002 spot and does
> NOT show the spot at the same area which appears on todays DSSII image!
>
> New Image
> Here is a .fits file of the Jan 19 image rotated and reversed. Still
> Dave or no one else brave enough has addressed the issue of why the NEAT
> images so brilliantly show the new spot when it doesn't seem to appear
> in any other images. I guess he has to do his usual dancing around...
> Maybe he's still reeling from the sting of your post which probably hit
> him directly on the head "...and I would'a gotten away w'tit too if it
> hadn't a bin for dem meddling kids!" hehe. If I lived next door I'd go
> over and give you a high-five :-)