Re: Crop Circles Man-Made NOT!
In Article <3B7EB947.702D@navix.net> Daivd Knisely wrote:
> You might want to read the book ROUND IN CIRCLES by
> Jim Schnabel (Prometheus Books), as it documents the
> phenomenon pretty well (and is a funny read as well). As
> for crop circles, they are probably off-topic on sci.astro.amateur,
> since that group deals with amateur astronomy and not the
> products of some pranksters.
A page from the Troubled Times TOPIC on Crop Circles
(http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword022.htm)
Why I Still Believe that Aliens Created Crop Circles
The mystery of crop circles is now solved according to
Colin Andrews, the electrical engineer whose investigations
first made the British public aware of this bizarre phenomenon.
In 1989, his book Circular Evidence (co-authored with Pat
Delgano) became an enexpected bestseller, partly because if
contained dozens of beautiful photographs of crop circles
taken from the air. In conclusion, the authors admitted that
there was a strong possiblity that crop circles were connected
with flying saucers, which had often been seen in fields where
circles had appeared. Now, it seems, Andrews has changed
his mind. After 11 years of research, funded by the Rockefeller
Foundation, he has come to the conclusion that the circles are
'simply formed by the earth's magnetic field.' This magnetism
somehow 'electrocutes' the wheat, causing it to lie down in a
neat circle. But what about the elaborate patterns that have
been appearing during the past few years: the triangles,
concentric circles, the exotic spirals, or even the enormous
key shapes? These, say Andrews, are all fakes, made by
hoaxers who use short planks to flatten the corn and create
the patterns. Only one fifth of all the crop formations - the
perfect circles - are, he says, genuine.
There is one simple and obvious objection to Andrews' theory
about earth magnetism. If crop circles really are caused by
some form of electricity, then why have they appeared only in
the past 20 years or so? England, Canada, America, Australia,
have been full of gigantic cornfields for centuries, and there
have always been chroniclers to record strange events. Why
do we not hear about crop circles in the time of Chaucer or
Shakespeare? Because, I am fairy certain, they did not exist.
Whatever is happening began in the mid -20th century. On
September 1, 1974, long before anyone had heard of the crop
circle phenomenon, a Canadian farmer named Edwin Fuhr,
who lived near Langenburg, Saskatchewan, was driving his
tractor in a field of rapeseed when he saw a round, shiny disc,
about 11-ft across, whirling above the crop and causing it to
sway. Then he saw four more in different parts of the field.
For 15 minutes he sat frozen with fear, until suddenly the
discs took off, rising in a kind of grey vapour. There in the
rapeseed were five circle, 11ft across. Hoards of journalists
rushed to photograph and report on them.
Other circles began to be reported: from Manitoba, Canada,
from Victoria and Queensland, Australia, from Ibiuna, Brazil
from New Zealand, the Soviet Union, France and Switzerland.
It was not until 1980 that the first crop circles were reported
in England. A Wiltshire farmer, John Scull, found three of
them, each 60ft wide, in his oat field near the famous White
Horse land-mark at Uffington. A meterologist named Terence
Meaden lost no time in providing a commonsense explanation.
The circles, he said, were by summer whirlwinds. But Farmer
Scull's circles would have needed three whirlwinds, each 60ft
across. In fact, they would have to have been tornadoes. In
August the following year, crop circles near the Cheesefoot
Head beauty spot in Hampshire refuted Meaden's theory. There
were three of them, one 60ft across, and the other two, placed
symmetrically on either side of it, 25ft across. They were far
too neat to have been made by a whirlwind - it was as if some
gigantic pastry cook had leaned down from the sky with one
of those metal cutters for stamping out biscuits. And the corn
around them had not been broken or trampled. So it went on
for year after year, with the British Press growing more and
more exited. Then in 1991, two Southampton artists named
Doug Bower and Dave Chorley announced that they had made
all the crop circles, using a short plank. They obligingly
demonstrated their trechnique for photographers by making
a pattern like a dumbell in an hour and a half. But they also
trampled down the wheat, and left broken stalks all over the
place. Genuine circles had bent stalks that were unbroken, and
no trampled wheat. And although Doug and Dave claimed
they had made all the British Crop circles, even they admitted
they had not travelled to Canada, Australia or the Soviet Union.
Again and again, observers noticed odd phenomena associated
with the circles. In June 1990, six observers at Wansdyke, near
Silbury Hill in Wiltshire, heard a high pitched trilling and saw
'black rods jumping up and down' among the wheat; next day
there were crop circles. A radio ham in Devon had his listening
spoilt in June 1991 by a series of high-pitched blips and clicks;
the next day, a 70ft circle was found nearby. Astronomer,
Gerald Hawkins was so fascinated by Colin Andrews' book that
he began to study the precise measurements of all the circles in
it. He soon noticed that these circles - often with patterns inside
them - had been constructed very precisely according to the
geometry of Euclid, the Greek mathematician who lived around
300BC and compiled what was the standard text on geometry
until the 19th century. So if the 'circle makers' were hoaxers,
they must also be first-class geometers too. Then Hawkins
noticed something even odder - that a large number of the circles
also had complex musical ratios, rather like the simple
fractional relationship that exists between the pitch of
different notes on a keyboard.
None of the circles made by Doug and Dave, or other
self-confessed hoaxers, had been made with this musical
code. As a scientist, Hawkins was naturally cautious in
announcing his conclusions. But he admitted to me that he
believed that these complex patterns were made by
extra-human intelligence. Their purpose was not to convince
the whole human race of the really of extra-terrestrials, but
simply to convince a few intelligent scientists and philosophers
that there are intelligences apart from our own, and that they
are attempting a breakthrough in communication. When I
started to study crop circles and UFOs in the mid-nineties,
I was convinced that they were due either to hoaxers or to
over-heated inmaginations. It took less than six months to
leave me in no doubt: that something or someone is trying
communicate with us, but with the exaggerated caution of
beings trying to get us slowly and gradually accustomed to
the idea. That is why I am convinced that Colin Andrews
will fail in his attempt to provide a neat and down-to-earth
explanation of crop circles. So far the circle makers have
managed to keep one step ahead of the 'explainers', and
they I strongly suspect that they will continue to do so.