Re: ZetaTalk and Spaceguard UK (D8) <= Graviton

In Article <f4aad97f.0108012236.51e5dd28@posting.google.com> Quantum Certainty wrote
> We have to assume then that the downward particles
> move at the speed of light. ... The strength of gravity
> would now not be related so much to the velocity of
> gravity particle as the quantity per given unit of mass.
> But this view is also inconsistent with relativity since
> one of our premises is that the repulsive gravity travels
> faster than the attractive gravity, and now the attractive
> force is traveling at the speed of light. .. Thus, it seems,
> we have to retreat to some odd quantum explanation to
> purge the inconsistencies

Quantum explanation as in gravity particles, coming and going?

    Gravity particles produce a flow but produce no
    discernible flow, and have no irregularities in the
    pattern. Does your Earth not pull evenly from all
    parts of its surface? And if there is a flow, then at
    what point does the flow reverse, such that surface
    particles are pushed away? In fact there is a reversal,
    but the outward streams are propelled, with a force
    and at a speed so much greater than the downward
    drafts that this occurs over less of a surface area and
    without engaging the mass of the object. A laser of
    gravity particles, versus a floodlight upon the return.
    So why would the weight of returning particles be the
    only ones mankind is aware of, and why would they
    not feel the violent lift of the updrafts? The updrafts
    blast through, tearing a hole as it were, where the
    returning particles do not tear what they press upon,
    and so have the greater effect.

    Gravity particles, in their motion, do not affect what
    they move against or through, the effect being in
    essence mechanical. The upward drafts push aside
    other matter, letting it return upon completion of the
    updraft, leaving no trace of the temporary tear. The
    downward push of gravity particles returning to the
    large mass they are attracted to, the core of the Earth
    for instance, spread out upon objects they encounter,
    taking some time to drift through these object and
    with a constant downward press during the motion
    of this drift. Thus, returning particles, due to the time
    they spend upon and within the surface objects, and
    due to their continual direction of motion, are a
    mechanical force that is stronger, overall, than the
    updraft of particles that quickly pass through the
    surface objects, essentially pushing them aside rather
    than engaging them.

    The nature of this gravity flow is what determines
    the repulsion force we speak of. It is a complement
    of gravity only when large bodies are close to each
    other. The updrafts, when encountering a large body
    also exuding updrafts of gravity particles, hold the
    bodies apart. This occurs at what humans would call
    a distance from each other, as small objects such as
    satellites do not exude updrafts and if far enough
    from the surface of a gravitational giant such as a
    planet, find a down-draft and updraft of gravity
    particles in balance, what humans might term in
    their ignorance a zero gravity field, weightlessness.
    At this point the updrafts are still tearing through,
    but at a slower rate, so that a mechanical push
    upward is involved, and the down-drafts are more
    thinly dispersed over the surface as they work their
    way through the density of these objects in space.
    Large bodies, exuding their own updrafts of gravity
    particles, create a situation where their updrafts and
    the updrafts from another sun or planet bump
    against each other, creating a buffer and preventing
    the gravity masses from touching or even
    approaching each other except at great distances.
        ZetaTalk™, Gravity Flow