Re: ZetaTalk and Spaceguard UK (D8)

The MISSING:

Since the orbiting satellites or space stations are infinitesimal in
mass compared to the Earth,
       v = sqrt( G*M / r )
works for them, consistently.  M2, the orbiter, being relatively
inconsequential.   It also works on paper for the Moon, except that per
this math you could have the moon at near ground level, moving no faster
than the satellites.  Intuitively, this is wrong, somewhere.  What is
wrong is that the force of gravity is STRONGER between large mass bodies
so the mass of the primary is not sufficient for Newton's math.   It
DOES NOT WORK.  Let's do a Newton (being exploratory with math) and see
if we can come up with a Repulsion Force R factor that would allow the
Moon to float by at the level the satellites orbit, without being an
absurd and intuitively wrong concept.

    Inverse Square      F = G*M1*M2/r^2
    Centrifugal Force   F = M2*v^2

Becomes
    Inverse Square      F = (G*M1*M2/r^2) - R
    Centrifugal Force   F = (M2 - R)* v^2)

So that
    Inverse Square      F = 0 at the point of contact
    Centrifugal Force   v = 0  and an object can hover at ground level

Per the Zetas:

    Why would the planets not drift into the Sun? Are the orbits
    all that swift so that centrifugal force is extreme? ... The reason
    Mankind is unaware of a repulsive force, also inherent in
    gravity, is that for this to become evident there must be a
    semblance of equality in size and weight, i.e. the mass of the
    objects, and freedom of movement such as exists in space,
    and lack of undue influence from other nearby objects. ... The
    repulsion force is generated as a result of two bodies exerting a
    gravitational force on each other. ... Where the repulsion force
    comes to equal the force of gravity by the time the objects in
    play would make contact, it builds at a rate that differs from
    gravity. ... The repulsion force is infinitesimally smaller than
    the force of gravity, but has a sharper curve so that it equals
    the force of gravity at the point of contact.

        ZetaTalk™, Repulsion Force
            (http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s34.htm)

So, what is the R factor?

And after we have this factored, we can plug it into the perturbations
of planets also under discussion, and see if THIS explains why the
planets RETURN to their orbits after having been perturbed in CLOSER to
the sun - what I've described for lack of a better term as the missing
push-away law.