Re: Planet X/Nibiru/Destroyer comet during the Exodus

In Article  <20010703234831.29903.00002446@ng-fx1.aol.com> Ben Ede wrote:
> I would like the Zetas/Nancy to comment on the following
> scenario: Insights into and revisions to the World of Velikovsky.
>
> Rereading Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision again.
> Struggling with trying to get a firmer grasp on the unusual
> cosmic scenario between 1,500 BC and 6-700 BC.
>
> According to him the ancients had reason to worry
> about the dangers Venus presented every 50 years or so
> from around 1,500 BC until the unexpected birth of
> Mars as the predominant danger every 15 years around
> 6-700 BC. Velikovsky presents tons of ancient material
> to support this scenario and also of course proof of the
> enormous catastrophe that hit our earth around 1,500 BC.
> ( 1,628 BC in my opinion).

Your first issue is to the MANY reports by the ancients of disruptive
passage and close encounters, some with measurable periods (52 years),
after the last passage of Planet X during the Exodus.

    Indeed, the last passage was CLOSER than the pending one
    in 2003.  This is why we have stated (and are asking Nancy
    to reference) that the crust shift was less than will be
    anticipated, as no sooner had the core started to shift, it
    moved to align with the passing Planet X.  What happens
    on such close passage?   There is a great deal of trash that
    trails behind Planet X, caught in its gravity field.  Several
    moons, and lesser objects such as boulders and dust.  There
    are likewise asteroid from the Asteroid Belt which attach
    during a passage, but can be torn away when a passage
    close to another gravitational object occurs.  These minor
    objects assume new orbits, in many cases around MORE
    THAN ONE planet if they are in close proximity to each
    other at the time, and finally to become disconnected or to
    assume what is termed a Near Earth Orbit object.  How do
    you suppose they got into those orbits in the first place?
        ZetaTalk™

And the existing ZetaTalk requested to be referenced:

    You will not find the prior South Pole, as there, out over
    water, a 3,600 old melt and rebuilding left no trace. But
    the prior North Pole should leave no doubt, as the Island
    of Greenland, with volcanoes melting the glaciers away
    in great floods, is still more heavy with ice than all that
    has accumulated over the current water born poles to
    date, within the past 3,600 years. Prior to the last pole
    shift there was a slightly colder Europe, a slightly warmer
    Russia.  And why did the continents rend, so that the
    oceans dropped such a significant degree into the rifts,
    during the last shift? Because the passage was closer
    than will occur this coming time. The exact date and
    time when the Earth finds itself distressed, and the
    passage occurs for [Planet X], are not on the same clock!
    The speed, therefore, of the shift, was enough to wrench
    the continents apart, in that the shift was barely moving
    before the Earth tried to pull into alignment with the
    rapidly passing X, rather than in opposition. The
    crust was therefore jerked to and fro, rapidly.
        ZetaTalk™, Prior Shift
            (http://www.zetatalk.com/poleshft/p99.htm)