Re: Hi Nancy :-))

Bill Nelson wrote:
> Look at the problem from a smaller scale. Say we shoot a high
> velocity rifle bullet vertically here on Earth (assume no
> atmosphere). The bullet will slow down, the fall back to the Earth.
> Now, do the same thing on Eros. The bullet will never slow down
> enough to fall back to the asteroid. It will keep going away forever.

The Zetas wish to respond:

    Does the expansion coming out of a Big Bang continue forever,
    or does it turnabout and become a large Black Hole, to start the
    process again?  A discussion on these issues places man outside
    of his environment, as to him he sees only expansion in the
    Universe around him, so a turnabout is theoretical and thus
    subject to haggling.  We, the Zetas, have visited portions of the
    Universe where a turnabout is in process, so can speak to these
    issues with confidence.  However, on these sci.astro debates,
    haggling occurs in any case. To make the statement that
    expansion goes on into infinity is to assume that such activity
    occurs in a vacuum - a silly assumption.  You have expansion
    and contraction occurring in a school yard, when a toy rocket is
    sent skyward and then slows and falls back to earth.  Should one
    of the boys declare that the rocket will proceed forever, based on
    dissecting the trajectory so ONLY the escape is considered, he'd
    be called a fool.  But on sci.astro, this is allowed to be a serious 
    argument.

    So what are the factors that influence a turnabout?

    First, the rush of matter leaving a Big Bang is not homogeneous,
    else formation of stars and planets would not occur but the
    Universe would be like Jell-O or pudding, all one consistency.
    Subatomic particles retain their identity even within a Black Hole,
    and waste no time returning to their familiar dance of interaction
    with other particles, based on their nature, when freed from the
    constraints of the Black Hole.  Thus, during the rush of matter
    leaving an exploding Black Hole, there are parts TO THE SIDE
    as well as before and behind any given matter or clump of matter,
    and this is the incipient basis of the turnabout.  An endless
    stretch into infinity, that silly argument, assumes ONLY the
    influence behind any given escaping matter, which is simply
    never the case.

    Second, incipient Black Holes are formed immediately after a
    Big Bang, and why would they not?  Black Holes are driven by
    gravity, a gravitational giant that assumed a density so intense
    that the flow of gravity particles attracted to it overwhelms the
    outbursts of particles squeezing out from the center, tipping the
    equilibrium such that an ever-increasing density of the
    gravitational giant occurs.  Gradually, it builds in strength and
    size, and pulls FROM THE SIDE that matter moving outward
    from the Big Bang.  So the motion changes from expansion to a
    slowing curve, and eventually to a compression of matter into
    the nearest Black Hole, and thence of Black Holes into each
    other, until the stage is set for another Big Bang.
        ZetaTalk™