Article: <5g94k2$68a@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: TUNGUSKA
Date: 13 Mar 1997 14:57:06 GMT
In article
<Forum.858016314.29323.richard.caldwell@OSF25.oklaosf.state.ok.us>
Richard Caldwell writes:
> I agree that it is possible to create an explosion with a cloud
> of gas. US military fuel-air-mix bombs prove it. However,
> those bombs use a gas that is *heavier* than air, so that it
> will descend toward the ground, not rise as methane would.
> Also, those bombs use a gas that burns *much* more rapidly
> than methand, creating the necessary over-pressures to
> generate a respectable explosion.
> Richard Caldwell <richard.caldwell@OSF25.oklaosf.state.ok.us>
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Here you concur that gas explosions can occur, and the compression caused by
over-burning gasses can create an explosions in a gas cloud. Certainly anyone who has had
a gas leak in a home knows that there is a danger of explosion from leaking natural gas.
Your US military gas bomb enhanced the pressure of an over-burn by using a heavy air that
would not lift, but THE SAME type of compression can be created by a large enough
over-burn. The degree of pressure coming from an over-burn is affected by many factors:
When you have a large enough cloud, mixed well with oxygen, in the over-burn, and the
size of the over-burn prevents ANY of the heat from the center of the over-burn going
anywhere but DOWN, and you have the ground under the under-burn gasses, and the
under-burn gasses are large and well mixed with oxygen, then you have what YOU have
described as a situation that allows for a gas cloud explosion.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])