| |
|
Article: <5fagcr$ul@sjx-ixn2.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: IN SYMPATHY to the Hale-Bopp Cooperative
Date: 2 Mar 1997 00:07:55 GMT
In article: <5f7grj$ckf@news.Hawaii.Edu> David Tholen
writes:
>> Nancy writes:
>> How could a comet perturb AWAY from Jupiter?
>
> You are misinterpreting the data. You can't look at
> placement on a two-dimensional sky and expect to see
> a perturbation in three-dimensional space correctly.
> tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu
And with a wave of his hand, Dave dismisses it all. Care to ADDRESS it, Dave, because its not going to go away. This is yet more evidence of the fraud that Hale-Bopp has been, in one form or another, from the start. JPL put forth, in their own words, the fact that the Hale-Bopp orbit had Hale Bopp supposedly SEEN, OBSERVED, at Dec 15 09 20 S on May 28, when Jupiter was at Dec 22 19 03 S. Then on June 27, Hale-Bopp was supposedly SEEN, OBSERVED, to be at Dec 12 17 04 when Jupiter was at Dec 22 48 45 S, A LEAP AWAY FROM JUPITER of 3 arc minutes!
| JUPITER May 28, 1996 | RA: 19 12 51 | Dec: 22 19 03 S |
| JUPITER June 27, 1996 | RA: 18 59 41 | Dec: 22 48 45 S |
..........
Per May 28, '96 JPL posted Orbital Elements and Observations:
| HALE-BOPP May 28, '96 | RA: 19 31 44 | Dec: 15 09 20 S |
| Distance from JUPITER is | RA: 00 18 53 | Dec: 07 09 43 |
........
Per June 27, '96 JPL posted Orbital Elements and Observations:
| HALE-BOPP May 28, '96 | RA: 19 0 10 | Dec: 12.21.35 S |
| Distance from JUPITER is | RA: 00 12 41 | Dec: 09 57 28 |
| HALE-BOPP Jun 27, '96 | RA: 19 00 09 | Dec: 12 17 04 S |
| Distance from JUPITER is | RA: 00 00 28 | Dec: 10 31 41 |