| |
|
Article: <5e58p6$9h7@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: Nancy/Zetas
Date: 15 Feb 1997 21:11:02 GMT
In article <5e3se9$5ku@nntp1.u.washington.edu> Lamont
Granquist writes:
>> Your assumptions are not to give us the benefit of the
doubt,
>> they are to CONFUSE THE ISSUE.
>>
>> 1. You have the 12th Planet moving at a consistent
speed,
>> either at the high speed we have given, where it
traverses
>> your solar system within a 3 month period, or at the
sedate
>> pace it assumes when midway between its foci. Is this
how
>> comets behave? They have a consistent speed, without
>> variance? They don't speed up upon approach to the Sun?
>> You KNOW better than this, and any fool can see your
>> motives here!
>
> Nancy, HELLO? READ WHAT I FUCKING WROTE AT
> THE VERY LEAST. Okay, I'll try to translate this down to
> language that evey you can understand. ..
>
> Then I assumed that it's going to be flying along as fast as
it
> is going to go past the Earth even when it is out beyond
Jupiter.
> The result is that it is 50 AU out or closer. ..
>
> Okay, I can make it move slower when it is 50 AU out, and
have
> the appropriate velocity past the Earth ..
> lamontg@nospam.washington.edu
I think the Zetas understood what you said very well, Lamont. Your clarification posting says that you are assuming a consistent speed for the comet behavior of the 12th Planet, just as the Zetas said you were doing after having digested your first posting.