Article:
<59rssd$ko7@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain - # 1
Date: 25 Dec 1996 18:47:41 GMT
In article
<32C01365.6C53@worldnet.att.net> Chirstopher Scott writes:
> PERTURBATION=A slight disturbance that causes a deviation
> of a celestial body from an equalibrium state. ... When the
> perturbing body passes Earth, it does just that, it passes.
If it
> were to remain static, the orbit of Earth would surely
change.
> When I say passes, I mean in a position to perturb to such
an
> extent to cause a measurable change in orbit. ...
> However, to simply answer your question:
>
>> given that the planets CHANGE when they are perturbed,
>> according to your God Newton, they should STAY CHANGED,
>> should they not? If an orbit swings wide to move toward
a giant
>> it is passing, should not the orbit STAY wide then? If a
planet
>> slows slightly due to a giant's gravity attraction
behind it, should
>> it not STAY slower?>>
>
> They WOULD stay changed if the perturbing body were static,
they
> are not. The extent of the perturbation depends on the
distance,
> size, speed, and the effects of 3d perturbing bodies on the
> perturbing body.
> Christopher Scott <CJScott@worldnet.att.net>
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Human astrophysics has two discomfiting notions they use as
guides. They can't put these notions together, so like two
passengers in the back seat of a car who can't talk to each
other, they stare out opposite windows and pretend the other
doesn't exist.
There are several problems for humans here,
none of which are addressed due to the discomfit factor. We will
deal with these issues on separate posts as a single post would
get lengthy.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk.com