Polar Ice
Conundrum
Why would Arctic ice be melting, faster than any Global Warming
model predicted, while Antarctic is gaining ice, an “expanding”
ice field?
- NASA Study on Antarctic ice Melt
September 21, 2007
http://inel.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/nasa-study-on-antarctic-ice-melt/
- Areas where melting occurred for a
greater number of days are indicated in darker shades of
red. Areas where persistent melting took place are shown
in darker shades of green.
- Melting Polar Ice Will Raise Sea
Levels Over 4.5 ft by 2100
December 1, 2009
http://www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/melting-polar-ice-will-raise-sea-levels-over-45-ft
- Apparently, the bulk of the
melting is accelerating in the western part of Antarctica,
where hotter waters are eating away at the ice. The warmer
water is getting under the edges of the West Antarctic ice
sheet and accelerating the flow of ice into the ocean.
- Satellites Reveal Why Antarctic Sea
Ice Grows as Arctic Melts
November 11, 2012
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/11/satellites-reveal-why-antarctic-sea-ice-grows-as-arctic-melts/
- The mystery of the expansion of
sea ice around Antarctica, at the same time as global
warming is melting swaths of Arctic sea ice, has been
solved using data from US military satellites. Two decades
of measurements show that changing wind patterns around
Antarctica have caused a small increase in sea ice, the
result of cold winds off the continent blowing ice away
from the coastline. The Arctic is losing sea ice five
times faster than the Antarctic is gaining it, so, on
average, the Earth is losing sea ice very quickly. In
places where warm winds blowing from the tropics towards
Antarctica had become stronger, sea ice was being lost
rapidly. But in other areas, sea ice was being added as
sea water left behind ice being blown away from the coast
froze.
- Ending Its Summer Melt, Arctic Sea Ice
Sets a New Low That Leads to Warnings
September 19, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/20/science/earth/arctic-sea-ice-stops-melting
- The apparent low point for 2012
was reached Sunday, according to the National Snow and Ice
Data Center, which said that sea ice that day covered
about 1.32 million square miles, or 24 percent, of the
surface of the Arctic Ocean. The previous low, set in
2007, was 29 percent.
- Arctic Ice Melt, Sea Level Rise May
Pose Imminent Threat To Island Nations
October 5, 2012
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/05/arctic-ice-melt-sea-level-rise_n_1942666.html
- Current melting trends show sea
ice is declining faster than the models predict. Per the
Zetas, the answer lies in the Earth wobble, which is
simultaneously creating a rapidly melting Arctic while
causing Antarctic to refreeze as fast as it melts.
ZetaTalk Explanation
11/17/2012: The
ice melt in the Arctic and refreeze in Antarctica is due to
the Earth wobble, which is vertical over the Pacific. When the
Sun is over N America, the N Pole is pulled down,
so that the warm Pacific waters are pushed through the Bearing
Straits into the Arctic. This has resulted in the past in kelp
and algae being found,
floating in the Arctic. When the Sun is over the Pacific, a
reverse vertical wobble occurs, the N Pole being shoved away
by the hose of magnetic particles from Planet X. Antarctica is
then pushed up into the warm Pacific waters of the South Seas,
which then run under the ice fields of Antarctica and cause
melting and large chunks of ice to break off, set adrift.
That Antarctica is
simultaneously thawing in this manner and then refreezing can
only be explained by the wobble, as re-freezing occurs when
the globe is tipped down so Antarctica has been pushed far
into the cold and the dark, away from the warm waters of the
South Pacific. Therein lies the threat, as the wobble explains
it all, and can be ascertained by the public if they examine
the placement of the Sun during the day. Rushing in to assert
that Global Warming is alive and well is the ridiculous excuse
for satellite failure – the thermosphere is contracting. Of
course the common man cannot determine this for themselves,
but is expected to register that the experts claim that Global
Warming is causing satellite failure. The theatre of the
absurd will not go away, and they have now sent in the clowns.
Notice the curious relationship between the date of the article
above titled “Satellites Reveal Why Antarctic Sea Ice Grows as
Arctic Melts” and the article below. Both published on the same
date. Is there some reason for the rush to relate satellite
failure to Global Warming on the same day that the poles seem to
indicate that Global Warming is flawed? The Zetas explain.
- Atmospheric CO2 Risks Increasing Space
Junk: Study
November 11, 2012
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/11/atmospheric-co2-risks-increasing-space-junk-study/
- Atmospheric CO2 risks increasing
space junk: study,
A build-up of carbon dioxide in the upper levels of
Earth’s atmosphere risks causing a faster accumulation of
man-made space junk and resulting in more collisions.
While it causes warming on Earth, CO2 conversely cools
down the atmosphere and contracts its outermost layer, the
thermosphere, where many satellites including the
International Space Station (ISS) operate. A contracted
thermosphere, in turn, reduces atmospheric “drag” on
satellites. A cooler troposphere will extend the lifetime
of space junk — staying farther out for longer instead of
burning up in the lower layers of the atmosphere, closer
to Earth. We would see some effects on services provided
from space if an important satellite was destroyed by a
collision.
ZetaTalk Explanation
11/17/2012: Why
does the cover-up persist, when Obama is intent upon revealing
the truth about the Earth changes, revealing that Planet X,
aka Nibiru, is the cause? We stated that the announcement had
only a 93% chance of succeeding, due to the intense reluctance
of many whose hands were on the cover-up, and until and even
after the announcement this crowd hopes to confuse the issue.
All who participated in the cover-up – NASA on the presence of
Planet X and the role of solar flares, the Global Warming
crowd on the cause of weather extremes, the USGS on earthquake
strength – all hope that the public continues to be confused
about the cause of these events.
Thus they emerge when any
information pointing to the Earth wobble or the presence of a
magnetic or gravity giant nearby is about to hit the news. The
simultaneous reporting of Arctic melt with an increase in ice
buildup in Antarctica was such a threat, suggesting that the
Global Warming excuse does not suffice. If the air is getting
warmer, worldwide, then why is Antarctica not melting? The
cover-up crowd rushed into the fray, immediately, with
speculation that points to Global Warming again. This battle
will frankly never be put to rest, as the cover-up crowd will
become more shrill while the evidence of Planet X becomes more
apparent.
Dark Twin Crowds
Close
The Earth’s Dark Twin is back in evidence, this time crowding
closer to the Earth. The Dark Twin is normally behind the Sun,
directly opposite the Earth in their shared orbit, so was not
known to the public though NASA
was aware of it. When the Earth encountered Planet X in
her path in late 2003, and halted in her orbit, the Dark Twin
emerged from behind the Sun and was captured
on film at that time, as well as seen naked
eye. When it came close to the Earth in their shared
orbit, it too halted, and was seldom seen as it is a black hunk
of rock, and sunlight no longer reflected directly from it
toward Earth. It was most often captured in recent years as a Monster Persona, not the true
size but the appearance when light bends out from the Dark Twin
and then returns back to Earth by gravity pull, making the
object seem larger than it is in reality. The Zetas warned that
the Dark Twin might attempt to fall behind the Earth, and move
ahead of the Earth in their shared orbit.
ZetaTalk Warning
4/14/2012: Where
the Dark Twin should be riding to the West, behind the Earth
in their shared orbit, we had warned that the twin would tend
to move behind the Earth as these planets are squeezed in the
cup, and thence escape by moving back into space behind the
Earth, passing the Earth in their shared orbit. At present,
the twin is caught behind the Earth in their shared orbit.
Now the Dark Twin is showing up on a November 2, 2012 video, not
as a pale large object, not as a Monster Persona, but in its
true size!
VIDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeFF0Jh3rWI#
ZetaTalk Comment
11/17/2012: The
Dark Twin has fallen behind the Earth, and is trying to pass
the Earth in their shared orbit. The Dark Twin is not a
magnetic planet, and where it is caught along with Venus and
the Earth in the crab-like pincers of the eddy flow of
particles coming round Planet X, it is not in a magnetic
dance. If fact, being farther out into space, and shielded by
the Earth, the Dark Twin has more of a chance of escaping the
crab-like pincers, as the particle flows dispel and dilute out
in space. How close to the Earth will the Dark Twin come,
while trying to pass the Earth in their shared orbit? No
closer than it is at present, nor will visibility of this
black hunk of rock increase if it does in fact manage to push
past the Earth.
Seemingly simultaneously, the Dark Twin started to show up
regularly as a black dot on the magnetosphere images. Created
from data from various satellites which orbit the Lagrange spot
between the Earth and Sun, or orbit round the Earth at the
sides, the magnetosphere simulation is done via computer
programs who model the data. Computer programs of course only
know what their programmers have told them, and the Dark Twin is
not in their knowledge base! Thus, per the Zetas, each satellite
gets a 2D view of the Dark Twin, and does its best to figure out
where the Dark Twin lies in a 3D view.
- WIND Space Craft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WIND_(spacecraft)
- Wind was launched on November 1,
1994 and is the first of two NASA spacecraft in the Global
Geospace Science initiative and part of the ISTP Project.
It was deployed to study radio and plasma that occur in
the solar wind and in the Earth's magnetosphere before the
solar wind reaches the Earth. The spacecraft's original
mission was to orbit the Sun at the L1 Lagrangian point,
but this was delayed when the SOHO and ACE spacecraft were
sent to the same location. WIND has been at L1
continuously since 2004.
- Space no Place for Cheap Satellites
December 15, 2004
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6800-space-no-place-for-cheap-satellites.html
- Solar, Anomalous and
Magnetospheric Particle Explorer satellite (SAMPLEX),
whose orbit criss-crosses the radiation belts.
ZetaTalk Explanation
11/17/2012: Is
this the Dark Twin, making an appearance on the NASA
magnetosphere BATSRUS images just to the right or left of the
Earth on the images? It is indeed, but why is it moving about?
The composition of the Earth is shown as a black circle,
central to the modeled images. It should be no surprise that
objects formed of rock, such as Venus, the Moon, or the Dark
Twin would show up also as a black dot. Venus is far enough
away to be excluded, and the Earth’s Moon is too small to be
included, but the Dark Twin is closer to the Earth than Venus,
and is as large as the Earth. Thus the particle flows from the
Dark Twin are not ignored by the computer programs employed by
the BATSRUS model.
What do the various positions
of the Dark Twin on these images imply about the position of
the Dark Twin during these dates, which show the Dark Twin
switching about between the right and the left in the images,
either in front of or behind the Earth. Satellites collecting
data are not taking a picture of what is at a distance, they
are recording particle flows in their vicinity, and can
misjudge for elements they were never programmed to consider.
The Dark Twin is directly behind the Earth at present, and
closer to the Earth than ever before. But satellites behind
the Earth and to one side will interpret a 2D particle flow
view of these two hunks of rock as being side by side, or this
or that one ahead of the other. This is a program failure, a
modeling failure, on how to interpret a 2D image into a 3D
model.
Does the presence of the Dark Twin, crowding the Earth into the
arms of Planet X, have anything to do with the increase in
earthquakes? The Zetas long ago predicted the ricochet effect
that the crowding of planets in front of Planet X would produce,
as this 2004 diagram shows. Has this time arrived?
ZetaTalk Prediction
4/14/2004: Each
such impact that forces the Earth into the arms of Planet X
creates more tilting and leaning and magnetic grip. In that
the Earth cannot back up away from Planet X, but may in fact
rebound into it when encountering her Dark Twin at her
backside while attempting to do so, it will increasingly
engage in the magnetic play that is inevitable between the
Earth and Planet X. Tilting and leaning or aligning with the
bully magnet that Planet X represents will occur, with
ricochet effects and twirling possible to an extent we decline
to reveal at this time. If the Earth has been able to avoid
Planet X as it creeps forward up to this point by backing up,
what would cause the extreme pole shifts that her geology
attests to? She is trapped, and the magnets engage, and the
Earth, inevitably, is the loser.
Plates on the Move
The 7 of 10 is in process, though has been slowed down by the humming boxes along fault lines. The
African roll continues to pull the Mediterranean floor to the
East with more land
cracks in Spain emerging on November 11, 2012
- New Land Cracks Opened in Totana and
Cotillo
November 11, 2012
http://www.murcia.com/totana/noticias/2012/11/09-el-ayuntamiento-de-totana-solicita
- The crack extends along the
industrial park in the direction of the sport city
Valverde Reina; It has a length of more than 300 meters
and a depth of more than two metres in some places. Crack
appeared two days ago and opens gradually in recent days,
reaching a width of 40 to 50 cm in some places. Recall,
that in the past month in area Puerto Lumbreras, has
already appeared a land crack 1.5 kilometers in length.
Cracks appeared around the world – in Costa Rica and Viet Nam
- for no reason other than plate movements which are firmly
denied by the establishment.
- Costa Rica: Huge Cracks Began to Show
October 26, 2012
http://www.nacion.com/2012-10-22/ElPais/Hundimiento-cierra-el-paso-hacia-comunidad
- Authorities still do not know how
to repair the sinking.
- Viet Nam: Serious Land Subsidence in
Lam Dong Province
November 16, 2012
http://m.tuoitre.vn/tin-tuc/Chinh-tri-Xa-hoi/Chinh-tri-Xa-hoi/185345
- The average width of 20 m, the arc
length of about 200 m, a depth of 7-10m
Earthquakes are occurring worldwide, not just on one plate
border but outlining almost every plate! Are they all on the
move, simultaneously? The S American Plate is rolling, the
Caribbean Plate is being crushed, the N American Plate is
bowing, certainly the Indo-Australian Plate and the Philippine
Plate are in a crunch, and quakes dot across the Eurasian Plate
to the spot where it meets the Arabian Plate. What’s left?
Antarctica is having a breather, at least on November 15, 2012,
the date this snapshot was taken, as is Africa.
What is commonly known as the Pacific Plate is, per the Zetas,
actually four plates. On November 15 buoy 46413 was throbbing
for no ostensible reason. But per the Zetas this buoy lies on
the Northern Pacific Plate, which is rising, as is Hawaii,
during the compression of the Pacific.
ZetaTalk Description
6/2010: The
Pacific Plate is assumed to be a single plate, but it is not.
Hawaii, which rides higher after every major adjustment in the
area, is rising, and this can only be the case if there is
subduction of a plate somewhere, pushing the plate that Hawaii
rides on up. The Society Island are on a chain that forms a
line with the Hawaii Islands, and such a rise is not a
coincidence. This is also a fault line, where a plate that is
subducting under the Americas is rising commensurately along
these island chains. There is a fault line running from
Kamchatka to the Society Islands, and both will rise during
the pole shift.
And of course volcanoes
active during the week of November 7-13, 2012 show the
stress along the plate borders where quakes have occurred – the
infamous Ring of Fire around the Pacific.
Internet Slowdown
If the charged tail of Planet X can cause static on the radio,
interrupt satellite traffic for cable TV, and increase the
likelihood of brownouts and surges in electrical grids, can it
slow down the Internet? Per the Zetas, it can indeed. In fact,
such slowdowns are with us now, and will only get worse.
- Today, Nov 6, 16 major US internet
hubs are down. I work in a computer lab and a lot of
people have been complaining all day about the
internet being slow and unresponsive, as well as people
complaining in a couple of forums that I saw. What’s the
cause?
- Packet Loss
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packet_loss
- Some network transport protocols
such as TCP provide for reliable delivery of packets. In
the event of packet loss, the receiver asks for
retransmission or the sender automatically resends any
segments that have not been acknowledged. Although TCP can
recover from packet loss, retransmitting missing packets
causes the throughput of the connection to decrease. This
drop in throughput is due to the sliding window protocols
used for acknowledgment of received packets. In certain
variants of TCP, if a transmitted packet is lost, it will
be re-sent along with every packet that had been sent
after it. This retransmission causes the overall
throughput of the connection to drop.
ZetaTalk Explanation
11/10/2012: The
Internet functions at the level it does because there are many
routes for a packet to travel, so that if one route fails,
another is tried. Then the packets are pieced together on the
receiving end. The Internet also repeats a send if a
packet is damaged or not received. There is a conversation
going on where the sending site anticipates a return receipt,
and it if does not get it, retries. Clearly, as
electromagnetic surge and brownout occurs during wafting of
the charged tail of Planet X, Internet traffic from Earth to
satellite and back again can experience damaged packets.
Earthbound electronics can also falter or be glitched. If
static occurs on phone lines or via satellite cable TV,
Internet packets can be damaged. The Earth wobble also affects
traffic, as satellites will not be where expected
periodically, requiring a search to align with the satellite
repeatedly during the day.
The overall effect of this
interference is to slow down traffic, as lost or damaged
packets need to be resent, repeatedly. If there are missing
packets at the receiving end, sometimes the whole conversation
needs to be reinstituted. This situation will only get worse,
as satellite failure is also a factor. We have predicted
increasing satellite failure from electromagnetic blasts,
whereby a satellite is damaged to the extent it is taken out
of service. This has already been a factor, though not
discussed in the media due to the cover-up over the presence
of Planet X. Will Internet traffic be restricted if slowdowns
become onerous? Certainly streaming movies would be the first
to go!
|